Print this document
High Quality
Open the downloaded document, and select print from the file menu (PDF reader required).
2.History of Stan Meyer
3.Stan’s Memos
4.Peter Lindermann – System Explained
5.Water Fuel Cell and the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics
6.Stan Meyer Patents
7.Stan’s circuits
8.Aaron’s posts on Stan’s Circuit
1.Introduction by MDG nov07: Stanley MEYER is the most famous inventor in the
'Super-efficient Electrolysis' field, and many took inspiration from his work. His
original Electrolysis Concept was able to produce many times as much hydrogen gas
as permits the Faraday's Law of electrolysis, and the Law of Conservation of Energy,
then he brought it up to a still un-understood high level he called 'Thermal Explosive
Energy'. We can say that he was at least 50 years in advance of his time ... The
evidence, then, is that his concept of electrolysis is tapping in another source of
energy, not 'recognized' yet in the classical physics, that must be in another dimension,
outside our three dimensions, and it must be a non thermic form of energy, because
Stan Cell is not producing heat while electrolyzing.
There is still not a complete concensus of the Experts in Zero Point Energy, Peter
Lindermann, John Bedini, Thomas Bearden, Moray King, Allan Sterling and many
others, on HOW Stanley Meyer was catching this ZPE. May be he was using Radiant
Energy High Voltage Pulses (Back Electro Motive Force) to charge his Capacitor/Cell
(two Stainless Steel pipes isolated by a fine layer of pure water as strong dielectric)
almost without current, until the breakdown level of the water layer was reached, at
which moment the accumulated voltage in the capacitor would be converted to
amperes that would split the water molecules, realising the hydrogen and oxygen, and
the power supply sensor would cut the input pulses, to stop any current flowing from
the source.
After all the electricity stored in this capacitor/cell would be used, the water would
take place again between the two ss tubes, reforming the insulating layer, the power
supply sensor would send again power for a new cycle of charging the capacitor/cell
to its dielectric breakdown level ... Electrolysis would be done with 'Pure Voltage
Potential' and almost no Amperes (current). See below the Peter Lindermann
explanation.
Radiant Pulses can be created by sending unidirectional (that's may be why Stan had a
rectifying diode in his circuit) short pulses in a coil/choke, they are called also Back
EMF, and are of a many times higher voltage level compared to the original pulses
sent. Tesla, Gray, Moray, Bedini, Bearden and many others are using this technical
trick to distrub the Vacuum Energy Field and organize and collect the ZPE to do 'free'
electric work in their apparatus. Perhaps Stan Meyer did the same, and this web page is a collection of information I found on the fantastic internet, that should make it as clear as possible to understand.
About the successful suppressed replications done by Dave Lawton and Mr. Ravi
from India, the calculations of their efficiency give around 200-600% (400 for
Lawton, 600 for Ravi, see 'replicas' page) of the theoretical Faraday maximum, while
Stan Meyer was at 1,700%, 17 times the Farady's maximum (Meyer interview,
Channel 4, UK, 17 dec. 1995). Perhaps we need to step up the original pulses to an
higher voltage, a few thousands volts at least, and then only we send this high voltage
pulses in a coil/choke or Tesla/Bedini bifilar coil (1 to 1 ratio, see below why) to
obtain consequent high back EMF Radiant Energy pulses to charge the capacitor/cell
to the voltage breakdown level of the water layer between the electrode pipes (in the
tens of thousands volts, Stan stipulated using 20.000 Volts in his 'memo1' (see
below)).
Or may be Stan Meyer is not even using back EMF Radiant Spikes for its super-
efficient electrolysis, but just direct unidirectional high voltage pulses to charge the
capacitor/cell up to its breakdown limit, through the help of the chokes ; quote: 'the
resonant chokes being specifically to damp the voltage spikes that could prematurally
set this thing off' from Peter Lindermann video, see below.
In this case it could be the very short pulses that would trigger a Radiant Effect in the
capacitor/cell itself, increasing the value of the original pulses, like Bedini explained
about his Simplified School Girl (SSG) circuit: there is a Radiant Effect in the coil by
the reaction to the pulse sent, this creates a Back EMF, when the electromagnetic field
collapses abruptly in the coil, AND there is also a Radiant Effect when the Back EMF
pulse hits the battery electrodes, and this one is also present when we use a capacitor
in place of a battery, like in his Window Coil Motor.
Another possibility is that Stan Meyer didn't revealed in the patent that he actually did
connect his 2 chokes in a bifilar configuration (Tesla/Bedini coil), and then that's
where he was creating the Radiant Energy Spikes ... see article below.
Actually Stanley Meyer explained is super-efficient electrolysis with the electron
movement and exchange between water molecules/atoms themselves, induced by the
high voltage field accumulated between the electrodes, and bringing the water
molecules to split (see below his 'memo1'), contrary to standard electrolysis where
that exchange of electrons is effectued between the water molecules and electrodes.
That was not accepted at the time he lived, but it has been recently scientificaly
confirmed, in 2005, by NAOHIRO SHIMUZU et al., that the use of ultra-short pules
can create a 'new form' of electrolysis, and with a better efficiency, but still inferior to
the Faraday limits.
Quote: It was found that by using an ultra-short pulse with the width of 300 ns,
electrolysis takes place with a mechanism dominated by electron transfer, which is
different from the conventional diffusion limiting process in DC electrolysis. End
quote. (document 'A novel method of hydrogen generation by water electrolysis
using.pdf' available ath ydrox y_ more.ht ml )
Could this water molecules broken through high voltage field attraction, pure
Potential Field that affect the electrons, be in the exact middle of the field, and
liberate their gases just there, at equal distance of the electrodes, because this could
explain the 'gas bubbles created in the middle' by George Wiseman electrolyser, from
eagle-research.com, and other experimenters on the oupower.com builders forum ...
and also that could be the most efficient way to create 'monatomic' hydrogen and
oxygen, having much powerful explosion power compared to standard hydrogen and
oxygen molecules.
Personaly investigating the ORMUS (with succesful trials), see other part of this
website, I think that somewhere this atomic Cooper Pair, Bose Einstein Condensate
and other Superconductors could have also a role played in this superefficient
electrolysises, or at least in the Meyer's Nuclear Thermal Explosive Water Energy ...
Which one is the right explanation ? Off course it may be a 'mix' of different effects,
but for sure it induces the existence of new phenomenons that are not yet described in
the classical physics books. But it's real, and it's just next to full systematic
reproductability. We can see that only off the shelf or low cost components are used,
and then it will be quite easy and cheap to manufacture.
Considering the large choice in sytems and technologies that could provide us with
'free power' for all, Stanley Meyer's process seems to be the most 'open source' and
near to completion of all, to furnish a considerable power with a wide range of uses,
technically simple and affordable. The Hydroxy gas that comes out from water
electrolysis is well known for its high power, and is already commercialized as
welding gas, cooking gas, domestic heating gas, industrial burning gas, vehicle fuel
saver gas and more. Off course the generalization of Stan Meyer's process with a very
high efficiency, many folds the one available now from standard Faraday electrolysis,
will boost the development of the use of Hydroxy (HOH) in our daily life.
Stan Meyer's secret looks finally accessible and simple to understand and reproduce.
That would be the BEST SOLUTION for free power NOW, at very low cost to
manufacture, with off the shelf material, AND FREE OF PATENT RIGHTS, being a
technology in the Public Domain now, after expiration of Stans' patents in 2007!
Add a Comment
Paul Defoeleft a comment
rarunkumariasleft a comment
taraff1left a comment